Pages

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

But they got Ovechkin, a guy who stands up for himself and requires no goon for backup

By Damien Cox, TheStar.com, March 15, 2010:
There is compelling logic to this argument given that on Sunday afternoon Colin Campbell had no intention of suspending the Washington Capitals captain, and then, surprise surprise, on Monday morning there was a hearing.

Apparently somebody, perhaps somebody who'd been taking long distance phone calls from unhappy Blackhawks executives, convinced Campbell of the error of his thought process.

Conducting the hearing without rolling his eyes in exasperation must have been one heck of a challenge.

Then there's the current environment of utter confusion. With the league still reverberating from Matt Cooke's completely unpunished cheap shot on Marc Savard, you now have a plainly illegal yet clearly less dastardly hockey crime dealt a game misconduct and two-game ban.

Another Cooke-like rat, Tampa's Steve Downie, tried to put a figure-four leglock on Sidney Crosby on the same day Ovechkin hit Campbell, and walked away scot-free. In another game, Islander tough guy Matt Martin drilled Dion Phaneuf face-first into the ledge along the boards from behind with no puck in sight after he and his teammates had vowed to get even with Phaneuf for an incident earlier in the season. Martin's punishment? A two-minute penalty.

But they got Ovechkin, a guy who stands up for himself and requires no goon for backup.

Well, they kinda got him.

See? In the end, nobody's happy. This sure isn't justice. It sure isn't deterrence and it can't possibly address the loss of Campbell to the Hawks. It's a two-game holiday for an overworked athlete who probably welcomes the time off with the playoffs just around the corner.

At the same time, it's punishing a big guy for overpowering a little guy, which in the NHL is what bigger guys are supposed to do.

``We have no problem with the way Alex tried to finish his check,'' said a defiant Washington GM George McPhee in a statement.

The business, meanwhile, of comparing one NHL incident to another is exhausting, and generally pointless. Blaming Colin Campbell, an honest man trying to do an honest job in impossible circumstances, is equally pointless. Even when he wants to take action, or is pushed into it, the sentences handed out are generally so mild as to have no impact. Just last week at the GMs meeting in Florida, Dallas GM Joe Nieuwendyk said ``one- and two-game suspensions don't cut it.''

If the league really didn't like Ovechkin's actions, if the Bettman administration really believes he's a reckless player who got off lightly earlier this year with a knee clip on Tim Gleason that saw him suspended for two games, then throw the book at him.

Give him 10 games. Or more. Otherwise, have the courage to say the referees made the correct call and play on.

But not the half-pregnant NHL. Let's try to give everybody a little of what they want.

The only significant impact of the suspension is that it could cost Ovechkin the Rocket Richard Trophy, and maybe the scoring title. Otherwise, a few writers might hold these suspensions against the Russian when it comes to Hart Trophy voting, but that's about it.

Of course, every borderline bodychecks will now have fans and teams screaming for suspensions knowing if they make enough noise and if the YouTube video gets enough hits they just might be successful. The picture is getting more and more distorted, with each incident exaggerated and twisted to suit individual points of view and partisanship.

It stinks, and a great sport suffers.

NHL on the fly tonight asked about the incident two players (Canadien's Josh Gorges and the Senators player, forgot his name, sorry) and the Red Wings Coach Mike Babcock, neither of them said the push on Campbell was dirty. Gorges said that Ovechkin is known for reckless play (that's why he is Ovechkin) and then "Was the hit dirty? Maybe." None of the three admitted the hit was dirty.




TWEET: TWEET THIS: http://tinyurl.com/ovetjkin
 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please help me understand the rules/logic of the NHL.
I don't want to bring race into this, but as a black person trying to get friends and family interested in hockey more, and football and basketball a little less, I am confused by this decision.

How is one person punished for an injury to another, but yet others are unpunished for other injuries ? Isn't an injury an injury. Also how is intent to injure determined ?

beergirl said...

This decision IMO is the direct result of the NHL screwing up by not suspending Matt Cooke for his hit on Savard. I suppose the league had no idea the backlash from players, media and fans it would take for not taking action.

Ovechkin is being used as a scapegoat so to speak and even Gold Medal, Stanley Cup winning coach Mike Babcock says that basically Ovi was thrown under the bus.

If they really wanted to make ammends with the fans and media they should have reviewed the horrible cheapshot Downie made on Crosby. I'm not a fan of Crosby however that hit that Downie made was truly cheap and has no place in the NHL.

Anonymous said...

This is exactly why I am confused. As I see it if a player is injured (concussed, broken ribs etc.), the player who caused the injury should be suspended if that is the rules of the NHL. But it seems that punishment is served based on the media/fan voices.

I have friends who watched hockey for 15-20 years. They introduced me to hockey in 2001 when I moved to MD. They have since stop watching hockey because the say the league is a farce. I am honestly beginning to think that way, not because of Ovechkin's suspension but the inconsistent rulings.

I really don't see how I can introduce others to hockey, when I have reservations about it.

beergirl said...

But that's not the rules...or not supposed to be the rules of the NHL (as far as injuries) In the NHL rulebook there is nothing on rules for injuries...if there were, there would be a lot of guys suspended.

The league on Sunday had decided that Ovechkin would not be suspended, because it was a play in hockey that happens every game, but most of the time nobody is injured. However because of many phone calls and pressure from the Chicago team, the NHL decided to review it again and suspend him. There should not have been a suspension in this case IMO and the only reason there was, was because the NHL messed up on the Cooke hit.

As far as the Cooke hit, it was deemed "legal" because no where in the rules does it say you can't hit the head. They're trying to change that. But they could have/should have gotten him on intent to injure since it was his third hit like that, but the NHL decided against it and it came back and bit them.

Anonymous said...

The Blackhawks team should have had nothing to do with this suspension -- the league should of ignored them. Wow I'm so angry. I hope Washington plays for the cup against Chicago and Caps kick their ass.

Anonymous said...

Tell your family that hopefully they'll get rid of Colin Campbell and maybe have someone in charge who knows what they're doing.

But also tell your family that hockey players in general are great guys, and Ovi is just a wonderful and funny person. It's too bad Brashear (who is black) is still not on our team, but when he was, he used to go clubbing with Ovi (my daughter saw them out a couple of times).